Directional YES to Stellar migration. Start two parallel 10-day tracks:
Both tracks run in parallel. Final GO/NO-GO decision on Day 10.
📄 View Full Technical Report — Comprehensive feasibility analysis (feature matrix, ecosystem assessment, cost estimates, risks)
Need written commitment + timeline for MiCA/GENIUS-compliant option (AUSD, USDVB, or other) with 3-4%+ NIM share.
Szymon can facilitate SDF intro to explore options
Technical analysis completed (view full report). State archival identified as HIGH risk with medium likelihood. Mitigation: automated TTL extension service + use classic operations (Claimable Balances) where possible instead of Soroban contracts.
Engineering team to review mitigation plan and implementation approach
Draft term sheet exists with detailed milestone structure. Key decisions needed from you:
SDF's position: $5M total budget (including any growth incentives)
Proposed structure:
Your decision: Accept this segregation? What's the walk-away line if SDF demands user milestones on the $4M development grant?
Needed protections:
Your decision: What other protections do you want in the term sheet?
| Total grant | $5M ($4M deliverables + $1M user pool) |
| Runway coverage | 12-18 months |
| Year 1 AUM target | $5-20M (realistic) |
| Risk-adjusted NPV | +$500K to +$2M (marginally positive) |
| Gas savings vs Base | 90% ($0.01 vs $0.10-0.30) |
The swing factor: NIM-sharing stablecoin facilitation
→ Full migration proceeds with complete product architecture (base layer + vaults + payments)
Option A: Payments-only integration ($2-3M reduced grant, yield stays on Base)
Option B: Vault-only product with limited capacity (revisit NIM in 12 months)
Option C: Walk away (stay on Base)
Secondary gates: Term sheet protections secured, no hard technical blockers identified